Friday, April 07, 2006

Mathematical/Empirical theory that disproves absence of God.

First let us think about law of probability.
Suppose a dice is rolled, is it really that the number of the face is absolutely Random?
The answer is no definitely not. It, the number on the face, depends on the velocity with which the dice is thrown, the vector position of the hand w.r.t ground, orientation vector of the dice w.r.t hand, friction of the surface, heat, wind levels and many other well known scientific entities. Mathematicians call it random because it is too complex to calculate and that these factors change rapidly.



The same logic applies to any other mathematical problem solved on the model of probability.

This fact is proven by computers. In computers, It is impossible to generate an absolutely random number. We could generate random number with some degree of randomness. At most, computers use some external factors and operate over it to provide a seemingly random number. But the fact is there is no algorithm to generate a random number. These computer generated random numbers are pseudo random numbers.

Some amount of pondering over this could easily convince us that nothing is fully Random. Nothing at all.


The non existense of randomness proves presence of god.

Lets ponder upon scientific models of genesis of the universe. It is widely accepted that big bang was how universe got created.
And it is also agreed in scientific community that, out of trillions of other possibilities, universe exists in the way it does today. That is, randomly things fell into place. 999 999 999 999 out of 1 000 000 000 000 times, if big bang re occurred, universe would be in a different way.

My argument is, when nothing is random, like the face of a rolling die decided by existing entities, how could what followed big bang be random?
I mean when big bang took place there was nothing, no universe, no space nothing. Full of nothingness. Nothing that happened at that point can be considered random.

The void created by absence of any quantity that science has yet defined, and the presence of some quantity that caused the universe to fan out the way it is today, proves the fallacy in scientific models that states existence of god is an impossibility.


If science proves, randomness indeed exists and events like face of a falling die is not controlled by known physical entities,We could assume that randomness is god. That randomness that selected 1 out of trillions of options to make universe the way it is today.

Any arguments?

Bala

3 comments:

Kirthi said...

I am not contesting the existence of God however, I see your argument as rather tenuous. According to your line of argument if the so-called "complex equation" that created the big bang and what followed were to be known to man he could play GOD!

anty said...

hey, bro getting to the chaos theory, huh! nice one..
y take the complex example of a dice....think of a coin, a digital output, yet no reliable model thus far...while math can only predict that the probability is one half...it needs powers beyond to rightly call it head or tail before the event!

like dan brown puts it, even scientists who promulgate the big bang theory, accept the singularity and incomprehensibility at time zero...that i imagine is the signature of god right there!

liked ur post bro..and ur one on the 2056 reservation tale...was a nice one..ven i read that as an email 4ward i had a laugh freaking riot..that one needs 2 b told betcha!

Nissim said...

I dont believe in a God...but what do u have to say about the Uncertainty Principle?
Is God free of it...or does it apply to him too?
A long chain of thoughts ...much too complex are now in my mind.
Will consider them carefully and blog.